Model Railroad Blog

Matte vs. Glossy Photo Paper?

As I continue to refine my technique of using photo wallpaper laminates instead of paint, one of the primary questions continuouisly on my mind is whether to use matte photo paper or gloss. On the surface it would seem matte would be the logical choice. However, at some point, just by chance I noticed that the colors on gloss paper appeared to be just so much more vivid and deeper. Was it my imagination? I didn’t think so. The problem is, if you go with gloss, at some point you’ll need to dull it down. Who wants a weathered freight station that shines like a clean window? And therein lies the problem. Dulling is easier said than done.

Even within the HP brand of printers, results vary widely as far as how dulling agents react with the various inks. In some cases earlier on, the dulling agent changed the ink to a purple or green hue. Not good. The next printer and ink combo. was totally fine. I could easily mist on Dullcote with zero adverse effects. That printer died and the new one had a different set of reactions, a noticeable frostiness upon drying that takes a lot of care and multiple light layers to avoid (this is with Dullcote or acryrlic flats. ). Inkjet printers tend to vary a lot when it comes to print quality.

One issue with photo paper is fade over time. The Downtown Spur is getting up there in years. Some structures are exhibiting noticeable fade and color degradation (my basement is a terrible environment. Humidity. Flooding, etc). Others have stood the test of time. The difference appears to be whether I used matte or glossy paper.

Yesterday I stumbled on an exceptional blog written by Joseph Eiten for Photo Paper Direct that lays the matter to rest.

He writes, “…..Matte photo paper is an industry term used to describe a whole host of Inkjet high-resolution matte papers. Amongst industry professionals and photographers, the real debate is whether ‘Matte photo paper’ is a true photo paper.

So is matte photo paper is a photo paper, it is up to you to decide.

From our point of view, having examined many thousands of prints over the years I’ll say NO. A real high quality photographic paper that is used in inkjet printers will provide a full colour gamut and spread with many more sub colours. True photographic paper will therefore yield the all shades of greys and colours that matte photo paper can’t.

What are its pros?

– Cheap option

– Can be more artistic if you like matte finish

– Good for using on day-by-day presentations

What are its cons?

– Print quality is nowhere near true photo papers

– Longevity and fading are a real concern

– Not a real photo feel and look”

So, there you have it, a pretty clear answer from somebody that appears to really understand the subject.

Fine Standards N Scale

When I started on the Brooklyn Terminal layout it wasn’t with the intention of making it a “Fine N Scale” project. “Fine N Scale” is a sub-section of the hobby dedicated to, as the name implies, much more delicate cross sections that are closer to prototype dimensions. It’s a small niche of a scale that is, in and of itself, already a bit of small niche.

As I mentioned, the plan wasn’t to head down the Fine Scale path per se. It was something I drifted towards in an effort to have better looking photos. You quickly learn that N scale in ready to run form, and close up photography are a match made in hell. In any scale close up imagery highlights and calls attention to the smallest of blemishes.

Fortunately for the HO crowd the market is big enough that manufacturers have the financial incentive to do a lot of the heavy lifting for you. Not so in N. There are some key areas, essentials if you will, that are grossly oversize and stand out like the proverbial sore thumb in a close up photo: track, spikes, couplers, freight car ride height, hand rails and grab irons, and wheel and flange width. With the exception of hand rails, there are workable solutions that aren’t overwhelming to incorporate. You can go with code 40 rail (although that will mean making your own turnouts), Z scale couplers, and BLMA wheels and trucks to lower ride height and give you a narrower wheel. However, workable applies to the visual side only. I’m learning that’s only half the battle because, at some point, it would be nice to have trains run and do so reliably.

Yes, it takes some effort but if you stick with it, the visual end of your N scale scenes can be bludgeoned into a degree of submission. You quickly learn however that with those ultra fine parts the tolerance for mechanical reliability becomes razor thin. What that means is that, even after you have the visual end of fine N scale in hand, the second battle begins and that’s a long and sustained tuning effort. Code 40 track is fine but larger flange wheel sets ride up on the spikes giving you a pretty annoying thunk, thunk, thunk. That’s just the freight cars. With locomotives, the spikes are a larger problem because as the wheels ride up, you lose the contact needed for electrical pick up and stalling becomes an issue. The BLMA trucks and wheels are things of beauty, however, narrow wheels are much less tolerant to out of gauge track than traditional “steam roller” wheels and are fairly prone to doing a face plant between the rails if the gauge is just a hair too wide.

It’s been a learning process but I’m finally ramping up on the learning curve. Making Fine N scale mechanically reliable has been an unexpected challenge but a rewarding one nonetheless.

Brooklyn Terminal April 25

Since the BT is a small terminal line with appropriately small steam power, I didn’t want the service facilities to be overwhelmingly large. Most commercially available water towers were simply too big so I kitbashed a Walthers rooftop water tank with some Tichy parts spliced on. The coal conveyor is from ModelTech Studios. The yard office is a scratch built structure that I saved from my old Monon layout. The final placement location of all these is yet to be determined.

Brooklyn Terminal April 12

Referring to my lack of recent blog postings, a few readers have wondered if I’m floating face down in the Calumet River, the victim of a long overdue mob hit. Rest assured progress continues. As I mentioned, postings about the latest few inches of progress land laying code 40 turnouts doesn’t make for the most compelling reading.

At least for now I’ve decided to hold off on the final crossover exiting the float bridge to see if it’s truly needed. If not, then the track aspect of the layout is pretty much done.

For those that model in N scale, decent code 55 track is more than adequate operationally and easily withstands the three foot eyeball test. Unfortunately it doesn’t present well in close up photography which is an aspect of the hobby I particularly enjoy thus the lengths I’ve gone to do things in code 40.

Brooklyn Terminal March 7

Weekly updates on my hand laid code 40 turnouts are probably as compelling as that of a farmer’s update on the growth of his corn field! The three turnouts I was working on off layout were finished and placed on the layout replacing the temporary Peco track that was serving as a placeholder. Now that they are on the layout, more tuning and adjustment to follow.