Model Railroad Blog

The Sensory Disconnect

I remember visiting the Miami rail scene for the first time as if it were yesterday. No photo, video, or television screen could match the all-encompassing sensory experience of seeing it in person. The heat, breeze, humidity, sounds, smell, and impossible-to-define energy completely transcended any previous ways I’d thought of it. It was the same on my first visits to LA and Brooklyn.


In recent years I’ve become increasingly aware of the vast divide between experiencing a place in person versus seeing it in a photograph.  I call it the sensory disconnect.  It sort of sucks to be honest with you.   I’ll often notice it on vacation or a day trip.  You’ll be loving an experience or vista laying in front of you and take a photo of it.  You look at your screen and go, “hmmm that doesn’t capture what I’m feeling and experiencing right now”.  You re-take the shot with different focal lengths.  Same result.  It’s just not the same. On the positive side, it works in reverse.  I can vividly remember visiting a place that I’d previously only seen in photos and being awestruck by how much better the sensory experience of seeing it in person is.  Light years, night and day different.  It’s the size, the feel, the sounds, the way a place just wraps around you.    It’s always millions of times better in person. 

There’s a direct correlation to how this affects our modeling experience.  Even if a person could masterfully model a given scene in miniature, it will never, ever give you the same experience as seeing it in person.  It’s interesting how this plays out in op. sessions.  When I visit a layout based on an area I’ve been to, somehow I enjoy it just a bit more than a perfect layout of a place I’ve never seen.  The reverse is a problem also.  If you have a group of operators over, I struggle with how I can give them the feeling of being in Miami or LA if they’ve never been there.  I don’t think you really can.  No matter how hard you try, to them, they’re looking at nicely arranged pieces of plastic.

Taking track-level photos of your model helps but only a little.  Taping prototype photos of scenes on the backdrop during op. session helps…..a bit.  I’ve read a lot of blogs and forum posts on photography sites where the discussion focuses on which lens size is closest to what the eye sees.  The forum discussions tend to go in circles with no real consensus.    The bottom line for me is that there isn’t  a specific lens size that provides the magic bullet to bridge the gap that much.  I have noticed in some rail fan videos where the videographer is low and closer to the tracks the imagery is more like being there in person.  Larger screens, such as in a movie theater, get you closer.

I built the model of the structure at 4722 Everett Avenue in LA many years before actually seeing it in person. When I finally did have a chance to stand in front of it, my immediate reaction was, “Wow, this thing is gigantic!” The mental impact was just so different than looking at the four-inch tall piece of plastic on my layout.

To an extent bridging the sensory gap is an unsolvable problem.  I’ve been rolling this over in my mind for a while and come to the conclusion that there is only one thing that gets you pretty close and that’s visiting the actual place in person.  Experience the sights, sounds, smells, and panoramas and register those sensory experiences in your mind. Create vivid memories.  When you do this, your brain makes an A-to-B connection when you look at your layout.  When you look at your models your mind ratchets back to the real life experience.  In the past, I never gave it that much thought but in recent years I’ve become increasingly aware of how much visiting the sites I model improves my modeling of them and my overall enjoyment of the hobby in general.


A note to my overseas readers that model the US.  I understand that visiting here is a significant investment of time and money.  For those that can swing it, I highly encourage doing so.  If you’re seriously considering such a trip, drop me an email and I’ll try to offer suggestions as to how to make the trip as productive as possible.  For switching and branchline modelers you want to visit cities where you have the best chance of getting a lot of shots in a short period of time.  This would mean places like Miami, Baltimore, or LA.

An Asphalt Technique

When modeling asphalt, the challenge is to get away from an overly uniform color pattern…easier said than done. I tried something new this weekend.

-Start by painting your street or parking lot surface with Rustoleum Light Gray Primer and let it dry.

-For the second level I used “Charcoal” colored grout. A nice quality of grout is that it’s less aggressive and doesn’t “bite” as hard as weathering powders. That makes it more forgiving.

-Take an old one-inch wide brush, dip it into a container of grout and then dab it on the surface.

-Next, take a cosmetic sponge and using mostly vertical motions dab and grind it in a little. Spread it a little around side to side if needed.

-Vacuum off the excess and repeat if there are any bare areas.

-Seal with Dullcote.

-Apply some very, very thin cracks with a super sharp, black, artists pencil

Choosing Your Theme

Latch Shoes at 2201 17th Avenue is the last major structure on my Downtown Spur layout. My model of it will be finished in a week or so. Reality is sinking in, the layout for the most part, is “finished”.

“Finished” layouts, they can sneak up on you. It begs the question, what next? Do you roll along, shifting your efforts to smaller and smaller details and rolling stock? Was “finishing” the main goal from the outset? If so, congratulations. You can enjoy running it for decades. The answer will vary from person to person. If you’re a diehard operator you’d probably keep it and run it. If you’re a modeler, you realize you’ve worked yourself out of a job. If that’s the case, then what? It’s something I’ve been thinking about more and more lately.

Theme selection is one of the most important strategic decisions you’ll ever make. Get it right and your enthusiasm will propel you forward for many years. As decisions go, it’s not always the easiest. For some, the theme choice is obvious and doesn’t take much thought. Others struggle with it and never truly find the sweet spot. The hard part is it takes a lot of self-awareness, much of which exists in our subconscious. Making it even more difficult is that things change. Our modeling interests shift back and forth. Social circles change as folks move out of the area or pass away. Prototypes change and evolve. People move to different homes. Nests become empty. People retire. Do you need a pure prototype? Are you happy with a totally freelanced theme? (I couldn’t do it. Too hard. I don’t have the imagination to make it plausible).

I’m not going to make any immediate changes but by 2026? Maybe. Prime candidates would be the FEC in Miami, Baltimore, or LA. Each has pros and cons making any decision harder.

Here are some of the things I look at. First and foremost I want something that “grabs me emotionally”, a place that I want to feel transported to. That’s the most difficult to find. Without that, I just have miniature technical exercise, that may be fun to build but won’t sustain me for the long haul. How well does the theme lend itself to modeling? Linear roads with the spurs parallel to the main fit onto shelves easier. Themes that are more circular or square are harder. Baltimore and the FEC aren’t as linear. How many contacts do I have to help with information? I have lots in Miami and Baltimore, none really in LA.

I realize that my interest is modeling something that actually exists, not something that’s now history. Site visits provide a major injection of enthusiasm. How easy is it to get there? Baltimore is super easy. Miami isn’t bad, I can fly down and back in a day for less than three hundred bucks. LA is harder and more expensive given that my long legs can’t handle six hours in an economy seat.

How important are operations to you? This is a tough one because I go through phases where I operate a lot and then go for months just building. I want at least some operational potential. This is more difficult to find with each passing year as the prototype, understandably, shifts to servicing massive industries that don’t lend themselves to modeling that well. I’ve never really established a local operating crew, mostly due to inertia on my part. If I had one, I’d be more likely to keep the layout longer. How many small to mid-sized, architecturally interesting, rail served structures are there? All three locations still have plenty but the numbers are dwindling.

Lots to think about. At this point there aren’t any clear front-runners that compel me to make an immediate change.

York Transfer Part 2

A month after my August blog on York, PA I made a second trip to the area. The gods were with me and I got the evidence I was looking for that York Transfer is indeed still rail served. This shot, taken September 24, 2024, was a real mess. The sun was setting and things were getting dark. The clouds were heavy and there was a light rain. It took several hours of photoshop to clean it up. This shot will never be available again as a storage warehouse is being built in front of it. You’re looking west in this view.


In my blog in August I highlighted York Transfer in York, PA. It became clear that many of my blog readers are familiar with and interested in the area. If ever there was an industry begging to be modeled York Transfer is it. Built in the late 19th century, it is still rail served. It appears to be a modern-era team track under a roof. During my August visit the rails were shiny but there were no freight cars in front of it. I got lucky on a return visit a month later and caught a freight car spotted at the platform.

In this August 2024 shot we’re looking west. The contents appear to be some form of bagged product stacked on pallets.

Here’s another view of the truck side of York Transfer (north side) taken in August. You’re looking west/northwest. Note the cobblestone drive which must be a good 150 years old. I talked to the guys in the background and they confirmed the facility still took rail cars.

Facing west from North Queen Street.